|
|
The original of the following letter was sent to my MP. The Rt. Honourable John Prescott, on my behalf, by Royal Mail Customer Services, by registered mail, because a number of previous recorded, and registered letters, containing documentary evidence, including my petitions, and manuscript, were presumed to have been lost, during transit through the postal system. No recipients' signatures had been obtained. It is significant, that I now have documentary evidence, that reveals that all of the correspondence was delivered, without signatures having been obtained. It is also significant that all of the correspondence, said to have gone missing, contained the same subject matter, and all were sent to Government Departments, that include the Lord Chancellor's Department, the Home Office, and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The matter was taken up by the Post Office Users National Council on July 7, 1998, and as I understand it, the matter is still under investigation.
Registered item Ref; WR 0175 4078 4GB
The Rt. Hon. John Prescott,
16th January 1998
Dear MR. Prescott,
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION & MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
I am very sorry indeed about being compelled to bring the above matters to your attention, by imposing on you at your home address, but I am not convinced that you have been made aware of the latest developments, regarding my formal complaints against a Circuit Judge, and of my endeavours to bring them to the personal attention of the Lord Chancellor.
The matter of the Judge's corruption is being kept from the Lord Chancellor's attention, by the Court Services, who is itself a party to the miscarriage of justice, and although I have recently been informed, that a file with my complaints, and a manuscript containing evidence, which was forwarded (note - said to have been forwarded) to the Lord Chancellor, by your Office, has now been put before him, I feel certain that he has not been made aware of it, and the Court Services refuse to provide me with a copy of a memorandum, that they say, they have received from the Lord Chancellor, that would have put my mind at rest. I do not believe the writer.
I am conscious of your workload however, the matter of the miscarriage, and conspiracy, is of such gravity, that I believe that it should, at least, be brought to your personal attention, because the Court Services have somehow intercepted a petition bundle, containing copy evidence, that clearly demonstrates conspiracy, and the miscarriage of justice, which was sent by myself, to the Home Office, for the attention of the Home Secretary. They have also somehow managed to acquire a second copy petition bundle, that I sent to you, at your Office, at the House of Commons, with the request that it be passed on to the Home Secretary, for his consideration.
The bottom line is that the Lord Chancellor's Department, through the Court Services, are determined to keep my formal complaints, and my petition, from the personal attention of the Lord Chancellor, and the Home Secretary, and in view of the gravity of such a conspiracy, within the justice system, I respectfully request your assistance, by your personal intervention, by checking with the Lord Chancellor personally, to find out if he has been made aware of my complaints of corruption, against the Judge, and by ensuring, that the petition bundle, that I sent to your Office, is either returned to yourself, to be passed on to the Home Secretary, or redirected to the Home Office, for the Secretary of State's consideration.
You may understand the stress, and anxiety , that these matters have caused us as a family, over the last few years.
The trouble is that nobody, within the Court Services of the Lord Chancellor's Department, despite knowing of the conspiracy, and despite, or because of the implications, has the heart to rock the boat, by being open about the problem, perhaps because the Department itself is involved in the conspiracy, to cover for Judge Simpson.
I enclose herewith, a copy letter, that I sent to the Chief Executive of the Court Services, which may be helpful, to the extent that you will find it revealing.
Yours sincerely,
J. F. Hulbert. (constituent)
NOTE - I have sent numerous
letters, including recorded delivery correspondence to the Office of the
Deputy Prime Minister, at the House of Commons, relating to the interception
of the evidence, by Mr. Huebner, and to the evidence sent to the Deputy
Prime Minister's Office, to be passed on the the Lord Chancellor, and it
is my belief that not only has all of the evidence been passed on to the
Court Services, but that these matters have not even been brought to the
attention of my MP: John Prescott.